Rationale for describing kurtosis as “peakedness”? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is the relationship between risk aversion and preference for skewness and kurtosis in portfolio optimization?Calculating Portfolio Skewness & KurtosisDistribution for High Kurtosisderivation of formula for portfolio skewness and kurtosisSkewness and Kurtosis under aggregationHow to annualize skewness and kurtosis based on daily returnsHigh values of skewness and kurtosis of realized protfolio returnsHow do I get Value-at-Risk for a GED distribution in R?How to estimate option implied skewness and kurtosis in RKurtosis in GARCH

RSA find public exponent

Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

Caught masturbating at work

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

Special flights

Are the endpoints of the domain of a function counted as critical points?

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

GDP with Intermediate Production

Getting out of while loop on console

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

How to change the tick of the color bar legend to black

What does Turing mean by this statement?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

How can I save and copy a screenhot at the same time?

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose-gear up landing?



Rationale for describing kurtosis as “peakedness”?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is the relationship between risk aversion and preference for skewness and kurtosis in portfolio optimization?Calculating Portfolio Skewness & KurtosisDistribution for High Kurtosisderivation of formula for portfolio skewness and kurtosisSkewness and Kurtosis under aggregationHow to annualize skewness and kurtosis based on daily returnsHigh values of skewness and kurtosis of realized protfolio returnsHow do I get Value-at-Risk for a GED distribution in R?How to estimate option implied skewness and kurtosis in RKurtosis in GARCH










1












$begingroup$


Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, many quantitative finance sources of information, including teaching resources such as CFA prep, persist in defining kurtosis as a measure of "peakedness." Can anyone give a logical rationale for this characterization in terms of distributions of asset returns?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
    $endgroup$
    – amdopt
    4 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, many quantitative finance sources of information, including teaching resources such as CFA prep, persist in defining kurtosis as a measure of "peakedness." Can anyone give a logical rationale for this characterization in terms of distributions of asset returns?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
    $endgroup$
    – amdopt
    4 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, many quantitative finance sources of information, including teaching resources such as CFA prep, persist in defining kurtosis as a measure of "peakedness." Can anyone give a logical rationale for this characterization in terms of distributions of asset returns?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, many quantitative finance sources of information, including teaching resources such as CFA prep, persist in defining kurtosis as a measure of "peakedness." Can anyone give a logical rationale for this characterization in terms of distributions of asset returns?







kurtosis






share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Peter WestfallPeter Westfall

1062




1062




New contributor




Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Peter Westfall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
    $endgroup$
    – amdopt
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex C
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
    $endgroup$
    – amdopt
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
$endgroup$
– Alex C
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
what is the "evidence to the contrary" ?
$endgroup$
– Alex C
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
$endgroup$
– amdopt
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not trying to be a jerk here, but "Peakedness," "Tailedness" who cares? Is the characterization even important? For any metric, understanding use and interpretation are what matters.
$endgroup$
– amdopt
4 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Quailtatively a (zero skewness) Leptokurtic distribution, after being standardized to have zero mean and unit variance shows three features when you plot the density and compare it to a standard normal N(0,1) distribution: higher peak, higher (fatter) tails, and lower mid-range(*). All three properties go together, even though people sometimes mention only one of them ("a fat tailed distribution"). After all there has to be an area of 1 under the curve, and a variance of 1, so a deficit in the mid-range has to be made up by an excess elsewhere, i.e. in the tails and near the centre. Otherwise it would not be a probability distribution or would not have unit variance. The peakedness in the centre "balances" the thickness in the tails while staying with a unit variance.



So "peakedness in the centre" and "fat in the tails" describe exactly the same thing. You can't have one without the other.



(*) By mid-range is meant the two areas, one on each side, located approximately one standard deviation from the centre.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
    $endgroup$
    – g g
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
    $endgroup$
    – Jacques Joubert
    3 hours ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "204"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Peter Westfall is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45215%2frationale-for-describing-kurtosis-as-peakedness%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Quailtatively a (zero skewness) Leptokurtic distribution, after being standardized to have zero mean and unit variance shows three features when you plot the density and compare it to a standard normal N(0,1) distribution: higher peak, higher (fatter) tails, and lower mid-range(*). All three properties go together, even though people sometimes mention only one of them ("a fat tailed distribution"). After all there has to be an area of 1 under the curve, and a variance of 1, so a deficit in the mid-range has to be made up by an excess elsewhere, i.e. in the tails and near the centre. Otherwise it would not be a probability distribution or would not have unit variance. The peakedness in the centre "balances" the thickness in the tails while staying with a unit variance.



So "peakedness in the centre" and "fat in the tails" describe exactly the same thing. You can't have one without the other.



(*) By mid-range is meant the two areas, one on each side, located approximately one standard deviation from the centre.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
    $endgroup$
    – g g
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
    $endgroup$
    – Jacques Joubert
    3 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$

Quailtatively a (zero skewness) Leptokurtic distribution, after being standardized to have zero mean and unit variance shows three features when you plot the density and compare it to a standard normal N(0,1) distribution: higher peak, higher (fatter) tails, and lower mid-range(*). All three properties go together, even though people sometimes mention only one of them ("a fat tailed distribution"). After all there has to be an area of 1 under the curve, and a variance of 1, so a deficit in the mid-range has to be made up by an excess elsewhere, i.e. in the tails and near the centre. Otherwise it would not be a probability distribution or would not have unit variance. The peakedness in the centre "balances" the thickness in the tails while staying with a unit variance.



So "peakedness in the centre" and "fat in the tails" describe exactly the same thing. You can't have one without the other.



(*) By mid-range is meant the two areas, one on each side, located approximately one standard deviation from the centre.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
    $endgroup$
    – g g
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
    $endgroup$
    – Jacques Joubert
    3 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Quailtatively a (zero skewness) Leptokurtic distribution, after being standardized to have zero mean and unit variance shows three features when you plot the density and compare it to a standard normal N(0,1) distribution: higher peak, higher (fatter) tails, and lower mid-range(*). All three properties go together, even though people sometimes mention only one of them ("a fat tailed distribution"). After all there has to be an area of 1 under the curve, and a variance of 1, so a deficit in the mid-range has to be made up by an excess elsewhere, i.e. in the tails and near the centre. Otherwise it would not be a probability distribution or would not have unit variance. The peakedness in the centre "balances" the thickness in the tails while staying with a unit variance.



So "peakedness in the centre" and "fat in the tails" describe exactly the same thing. You can't have one without the other.



(*) By mid-range is meant the two areas, one on each side, located approximately one standard deviation from the centre.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Quailtatively a (zero skewness) Leptokurtic distribution, after being standardized to have zero mean and unit variance shows three features when you plot the density and compare it to a standard normal N(0,1) distribution: higher peak, higher (fatter) tails, and lower mid-range(*). All three properties go together, even though people sometimes mention only one of them ("a fat tailed distribution"). After all there has to be an area of 1 under the curve, and a variance of 1, so a deficit in the mid-range has to be made up by an excess elsewhere, i.e. in the tails and near the centre. Otherwise it would not be a probability distribution or would not have unit variance. The peakedness in the centre "balances" the thickness in the tails while staying with a unit variance.



So "peakedness in the centre" and "fat in the tails" describe exactly the same thing. You can't have one without the other.



(*) By mid-range is meant the two areas, one on each side, located approximately one standard deviation from the centre.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 8 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Alex CAlex C

6,72211123




6,72211123











  • $begingroup$
    I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
    $endgroup$
    – g g
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
    $endgroup$
    – Jacques Joubert
    3 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
    $endgroup$
    – g g
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
    $endgroup$
    – Jacques Joubert
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
$endgroup$
– g g
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I understand where you are coming from but I think this is fruitless. Distributions are functions, i.e. they have infinite degrees of freedom. Were your statement still true if the distribution is multimodal or had point masses?
$endgroup$
– g g
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
$endgroup$
– Jacques Joubert
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Fat tails are a problem because so many of the models we use assume that the data are Gaussian IID. Fat tails means an increased probablility of events that we considered rare. For example the Black Scholes option pricing model assume your data are Gaussian. If they have a high kurtosis, this problematic.
$endgroup$
– Jacques Joubert
3 hours ago











Peter Westfall is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Peter Westfall is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter Westfall is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter Westfall is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45215%2frationale-for-describing-kurtosis-as-peakedness%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Disable / Remove link to Product Items in Cart Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How can I limit products that can be bought / added to cart?Remove item from cartHide “Add to Cart” button if specific products are already in cart“Prettifying” the custom options in cart pageCreate link in cart sidebar to view all added items After limit reachedLink products together in checkout/cartHow to Get product from cart and add it againHide action-edit on cart page if simple productRemoving Cart items - ObserverRemove wishlist items when added to cart

Helsingin valtaus Sisällysluettelo Taustaa | Yleistä sotatoimista | Osapuolet | Taistelut Helsingin ympäristössä | Punaisten antautumissuunnitelma | Taistelujen kulku Helsingissä | Valtauksen jälkeen | Tappiot | Muistaminen | Kirjallisuutta | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoTeoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioGoogle BooksSisällissota Helsingissä päättyi tasan 95 vuotta sittenSaksalaisten ylivoima jyräsi punaisen HelsinginSuomalaiset kuvaavat sotien jälkiä kaupungeissa – katso kuvat ja tarinat tutuilta kulmiltaHelsingin valtaus 90 vuotta sittenSaksalaiset valtasivat HelsinginHyökkäys HelsinkiinHelsingin valtaus 12.–13.4. 1918Saksalaiset käyttivät ihmiskilpiä Helsingin valtauksessa 1918Teoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioSaksalaiset hyökkäävät Etelä-SuomeenTaistelut LeppävaarassaSotilaat ja taistelutLeppävaara 1918 huhtikuussa. KapinatarinaHelsingin taistelut 1918Saksalaisten voitonparaati HelsingissäHelsingin valtausta juhlittiinSaksalaisten Helsinki vuonna 1918Helsingin taistelussa kaatuneet valkokaartilaisetHelsinkiin haudatut taisteluissa kaatuneet punaiset12.4.1918 Helsingin valtauksessa saksalaiset apujoukot vapauttavat kaupunginVapaussodan muistomerkkejä Helsingissä ja pääkaupunkiseudullaCrescendo / Vuoden 1918 Kansalaissodan uhrien muistomerkkim

Adjektiivitarina Tarinan tekeminen | Esimerkki: ennen | Esimerkki: jälkeen | Navigointivalikko