Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"

Is Fable (1996) connected in any way to the Fable franchise from Lionhead Studios?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

What does "enim et" mean?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

What do you call words made from common English words?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Is this food a bread or a loaf?



Why was the “bread communication” in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?


Why was the end of Watchmen changed in the movie version?Why was a certain character in The Hunger Games killed?Did Peter Jackson ever explain why he left out the Scouring of the Shire?Why did Harry not repair his wand in the movie?Are there any differences between the Catching Fire movie and book?Why were the trackers necessary in Catching Fire?The Hunger Angst. Why the Arena tech yet the population is subjugated?Why didn't a certain character communicate more to his co-conspirators in Catching Fire?Why didn't the Tributes jump the gun in Catching Fire?Why was Gale edited out of the propos in the movie version?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 8





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    12 hours ago


















11















In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 8





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    12 hours ago














11












11








11








In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In the book, Katniss and her partners received several pieces of bread during the course of the game. The amount and type of bread serves as a countdown for a start of the rebellion.



Bread seemed so innocent, yet was used to communicate between mentor and tribute for the start of a rebellion in the 75th Hunger Games.



This was a significant detail in the book, so why did they chose to leave it out in the movie?







adaptation-comparison the-hunger-games catching-fire






share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago









Thunderforge

31.4k23149310




31.4k23149310






New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 13 hours ago









PanchoaPanchoa

566




566




New contributor




Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Panchoa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 8





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    12 hours ago













  • 8





    why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

    – witchy
    12 hours ago








8




8





why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

– witchy
12 hours ago






why waste time on boring moss colored bread props when u have a 130M budget and can do poisonous fog & vamp monkeys?

– witchy
12 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















18














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    8 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









18














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    8 hours ago















18














Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    8 hours ago













18












18








18







Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.






share|improve this answer















Books and movies are fundamentally different media, and require different storytelling techniques



Movies are better at conveying some things, like action or background events, but much worse at conveying other details, such as private character thoughts and expository details.



Also, movies have much less space for content than books do. Your average 100k word book does not fit in a 2 hour movie without significant trimming. Some things have to be cut.



The bread communication was intrinsically difficult to portray

The whole point of the bread was that the characters were not free to speak openly. That means that we would need some kind of internal monologue in order to explain the significance of the bread. An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie.



Something had to be cut for space reasons, so they chose this detail that was ill-suited for the screen as one of the cut items.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 12 hours ago









Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

2,358723




2,358723







  • 3





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    8 hours ago












  • 3





    "An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

    – Thunderforge
    12 hours ago






  • 1





    @Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

    – Darrel Hoffman
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

    – Panchoa
    11 hours ago






  • 3





    @Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

    – Upper_Case
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

    – Upper_Case
    8 hours ago







3




3





"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

– Thunderforge
12 hours ago





"An internal monologue or narration isn't something you can just add for one detail - you'd need to use it throughout the story, and it would significantly change the feel of the movie." Case in point: David Lynch's Dune. There's a reason that it's so rarely done in film.

– Thunderforge
12 hours ago




1




1





@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

– Darrel Hoffman
11 hours ago





@Thunderforge Overall, this was the biggest difference between the books and the films in this case. The books spend so much time inside Katniss' head and all of that had to be left out of the movies because they didn't want use a voiceover narration. It had the unfortunate side-effect of making her performance seem a bit stiff and emotionless, but this is actually book-accurate because she had to conceal her emotions for the sake of the games. It just doesn't translate very well to film.

– Darrel Hoffman
11 hours ago




1




1





I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

– Panchoa
11 hours ago





I agree that books and movies are different, a book can exploit so much more details than a movie but in this case, if I remember well, the amount and type of bread was explained by Beetee after they got out of the arena. So that's why I wondered why they didn't translated it to the movie.

– Panchoa
11 hours ago




3




3





@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

– Upper_Case
9 hours ago





@Panchoa I think that this answer is correct, but in this specific case there's also another factor. The point of the bread signals (plot-wise) is that they're extremely difficult to notice. For something to matter in a movie, it needs to be noticed by the audience (or at least be notice-able). It would be a challenge to make the bread, and its importance, clear to the audience throughout the story while also having it be subtle enough to be effective within the story. Perhaps it could be done, but it might be very challenging to do so and not worth the effort of the people making the movie.

– Upper_Case
9 hours ago




1




1





@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

– Upper_Case
8 hours ago





@ArtemisFowl I'm usually of the opinion that movies should be as faithful to the books they're based on as possible, but sometimes that does make for a worse movie. If "doing it" in this case meant the movie took 6 months longer to release, and ruined a bunch of effective shots to highlight bread quantity, and required otherwise irrelevant scenes and sequences only to highlight that single plot point, it's possible that (given the option of different cuts) you would prefer the slightly less faithful one. I love GoT, but a perfectly faithful adaptation would be difficult to watch.

– Upper_Case
8 hours ago










Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Panchoa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208706%2fwhy-was-the-bread-communication-in-the-arena-of-catching-fire-left-out-in-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Disable / Remove link to Product Items in Cart Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How can I limit products that can be bought / added to cart?Remove item from cartHide “Add to Cart” button if specific products are already in cart“Prettifying” the custom options in cart pageCreate link in cart sidebar to view all added items After limit reachedLink products together in checkout/cartHow to Get product from cart and add it againHide action-edit on cart page if simple productRemoving Cart items - ObserverRemove wishlist items when added to cart

Helsingin valtaus Sisällysluettelo Taustaa | Yleistä sotatoimista | Osapuolet | Taistelut Helsingin ympäristössä | Punaisten antautumissuunnitelma | Taistelujen kulku Helsingissä | Valtauksen jälkeen | Tappiot | Muistaminen | Kirjallisuutta | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoTeoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioGoogle BooksSisällissota Helsingissä päättyi tasan 95 vuotta sittenSaksalaisten ylivoima jyräsi punaisen HelsinginSuomalaiset kuvaavat sotien jälkiä kaupungeissa – katso kuvat ja tarinat tutuilta kulmiltaHelsingin valtaus 90 vuotta sittenSaksalaiset valtasivat HelsinginHyökkäys HelsinkiinHelsingin valtaus 12.–13.4. 1918Saksalaiset käyttivät ihmiskilpiä Helsingin valtauksessa 1918Teoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioSaksalaiset hyökkäävät Etelä-SuomeenTaistelut LeppävaarassaSotilaat ja taistelutLeppävaara 1918 huhtikuussa. KapinatarinaHelsingin taistelut 1918Saksalaisten voitonparaati HelsingissäHelsingin valtausta juhlittiinSaksalaisten Helsinki vuonna 1918Helsingin taistelussa kaatuneet valkokaartilaisetHelsinkiin haudatut taisteluissa kaatuneet punaiset12.4.1918 Helsingin valtauksessa saksalaiset apujoukot vapauttavat kaupunginVapaussodan muistomerkkejä Helsingissä ja pääkaupunkiseudullaCrescendo / Vuoden 1918 Kansalaissodan uhrien muistomerkkim

Adjektiivitarina Tarinan tekeminen | Esimerkki: ennen | Esimerkki: jälkeen | Navigointivalikko