Does every subgroup of an abelian group have to be abelian? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraA condition for a subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group to have finite indexAdditive non-abelian group?Galois Group, Field Extension Prove AbelianCommutator subgroup is the minimal normal subgroup such that quotient group is abelianShowing that every subgroup of an abelian group is normalevery subgroup of the quaternion group is normalQuotient Group $D_2n/R$ is abelian where $R$ is the group of rotations?Proving a subgroup of a Galois group is normalNormal Subgroup of Galois GroupFaithful group action and Galois correspondence

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

RIP Packet Format

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

using NDEigensystem to solve the Mathieu equation

Will I lose my paid in full property

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

Mechanism of the formation of peracetic acid

Why isPrototypeOf() returns false?

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

What is a good proxy for government quality?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

Marquee sign letters

Is there an efficient way for synchronising audio events real-time with LEDs using an MCU?

In search of the origins of term censor, I hit a dead end stuck with the greek term, to censor, λογοκρίνω

Was Objective-C really a hindrance to Apple software development?

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Stretch a Tikz tree

Bright yellow or light yellow?

Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?

Retract an already submitted Recommendation Letter (written for an undergrad student)

Coin Game with infinite paradox



Does every subgroup of an abelian group have to be abelian?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraA condition for a subgroup of a finitely generated free abelian group to have finite indexAdditive non-abelian group?Galois Group, Field Extension Prove AbelianCommutator subgroup is the minimal normal subgroup such that quotient group is abelianShowing that every subgroup of an abelian group is normalevery subgroup of the quaternion group is normalQuotient Group $D_2n/R$ is abelian where $R$ is the group of rotations?Proving a subgroup of a Galois group is normalNormal Subgroup of Galois GroupFaithful group action and Galois correspondence










4












$begingroup$


My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



    So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



      So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My original problem is to show that E/L is an abelian extension over L and L/F is an abelian extension over F, given that E/F is an abelian extension over F and that L is a normal extension of F such that $Fsubseteq L subseteq E$.



      So far I have proved that E is a normal extension of F, E is a normal extension of L, and L is a normal extension of F. I know that to prove abelian extension I must also prove that Gal(E/L) is an abelian group. I have shown that Gal(E/L) $subseteq$ Gal (E/F). In my mind it makes sense that I cannot lose commutativity therefore my subgroup must be Abelian too. How do I show this in a proof? Is it enough to show two elements in the subgroup must also exist in the larger group and that they must be commutative in the larger group? I feel like I know what needs to be done, just not how to phrase it.







      abstract-algebra group-theory galois-theory abelian-groups






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 5 hours ago









      J. W. Tanner

      5,1651520




      5,1651520










      asked 6 hours ago









      MT mathMT math

      303




      303




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



          Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



          Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            5 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198960%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-an-abelian-group-have-to-be-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              5 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              5 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Huh, funny, we just went over this today in my algebra class.



            Yes, subgroups of abelian groups are indeed abelian, and your thought process has the right idea.



            Showing this is pretty easy. Take an abelian group $G$ with subgroup $H$. Then we know that, for all $a,bin H$, $ab=ba$ since it must also hold in $G$ (as $a,b in G ge H$ and $G$ is given to be abelian).







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

            10.8k31843




            10.8k31843











            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              5 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
              $endgroup$
              – MT math
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I believe so, yes.
              $endgroup$
              – Eevee Trainer
              5 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            can I use essentially the same reasoning to prove that L/F is an abelian extension as well?
            $endgroup$
            – MT math
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I believe so, yes.
            $endgroup$
            – Eevee Trainer
            5 hours ago











            2












            $begingroup$

            If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                If $G$ is an abelian group and $H$ is a subgroup, suppose $x, yin H$. Then in particular $x, yin G$, so $xy=yx$. Since $x, y$ were arbitrary, $H$ is abelian.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                39.5k63870




                39.5k63870



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3198960%2fdoes-every-subgroup-of-an-abelian-group-have-to-be-abelian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive faiuresHP SmartArray P400: How to repair failed logical drive?Reusing Raid 5 Drive?reliably and automatically determine connection path of physical position of HDD from /dev/sdX device fileHow to replace failed drive in RAID 5 array in HP DL380 G4 serverQuestions on increasing RAID 5 arrayRaid 10, Logical device are missingHP Code 341 “Physical Drive State: Predictive failure. This physical drive is predicted to fail soon.”HPE 1.92TB SATA 6G Mixed Use SFF SSD very slow compared to SAS HDD HP disksHP drive array “ready for rebuild” (RAID5)Hard Disc Failure or RAID Glitch

                    Jalkaväkirykmentti 49 (jatkosota) Sisällysluettelo Perustaminen | Keskittäminen | Komentaja(t) | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKlaajentamalla

                    Can Not View Content Blocks due to require.js error - Magento 2 theme change Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?get requirejs-config.js to load declared cdn's for jqueryOverride Magento/Checkout/view/frontend/web/js/view/shipping.js in custom theme not workingAdding Custom JS to Magento 2 Themerequire.js error on Magento 2Magento 2 require js throw errorMagento 2.1.2 regionUpdater js error on register.phtmlError loading popper.js on Magento 2 Theme (require js)requirejs error in my child themeIssue with bootstrap 4 in magento 2Magento 2 checkout page keeps on loading.In console,$.event.props is undefined in jquery.mobile.custom.js:44:2.How to clear that?Magento 2 Stuck on Checkout page