Wrapping homogeneous python objects2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?

Probably overheated black color SMD pads

Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous

Help rendering a complicated sum/product formula

Wrapping homogeneous python objects

What if (if any) the reason to buy in small local stores?

Optimising a list searching algorithm

Describing a chess game in a novel

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

Tikz: place node leftmost of two nodes of different widths

Worshiping one God at a time?

What should I install to correct "ld: cannot find -lgbm and -linput" so that I can compile a Rust program?

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

Bash - pair each line of file

Can a medieval gyroplane be built?

Unfrosted light bulb

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

Suggestions on how to spend Shaabath (constructively) alone

How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?

Does the attack bonus from a Masterwork weapon stack with the attack bonus from Masterwork ammunition?

How does one measure the Fourier components of a signal?

Print last inputted byte

Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?

Variable completely messes up echoed string

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?



Wrapping homogeneous python objects



2019 Community Moderator ElectionPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?










6















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper but could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big) and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    3 hours ago















6















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper but could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big) and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    3 hours ago













6












6








6


2






I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper but could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big) and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question
















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper but could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big) and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)







python






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 53 mins ago







TinyTheBrontosaurus

















asked 3 hours ago









TinyTheBrontosaurusTinyTheBrontosaurus

1,32511025




1,32511025







  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    3 hours ago












  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    3 hours ago







2




2





How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
3 hours ago






How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
3 hours ago














is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
3 hours ago





is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
3 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



class Wrapper: 
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f


For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






share|improve this answer

























  • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago












  • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    3 hours ago











  • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago











  • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    55 mins ago


















1














I think you have the right idea here



wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type

for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12


Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      3 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      55 mins ago















    4














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      3 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      55 mins ago













    4












    4








    4







    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer















    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 3 hours ago

























    answered 3 hours ago









    65026502

    87.3k13115217




    87.3k13115217












    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      3 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      55 mins ago

















    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      3 hours ago











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      3 hours ago











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      55 mins ago
















    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago






    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago














    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    3 hours ago





    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    3 hours ago













    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago





    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    3 hours ago













    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    55 mins ago





    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    55 mins ago













    1














    I think you have the right idea here



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


    You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



    class WrapperClass(list):
    def __init__(self, api_type):
    self.api_type = api_type

    for func in dir(api_type):
    if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
    setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
    [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

    w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
    o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
    w.append(o1)
    w.append(o2)
    print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
    # [None, None]
    print(w[0].b)
    # 12
    print(w[1].b)
    # 12
    print(o1.b)
    # 12


    Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



    Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



    def append(self, item):
    if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
    raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
    super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





    share|improve this answer





























      1














      I think you have the right idea here



      wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
      for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
      wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


      You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



      class WrapperClass(list):
      def __init__(self, api_type):
      self.api_type = api_type

      for func in dir(api_type):
      if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
      setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
      [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

      w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
      o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
      w.append(o1)
      w.append(o2)
      print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
      # [None, None]
      print(w[0].b)
      # 12
      print(w[1].b)
      # 12
      print(o1.b)
      # 12


      Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



      Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



      def append(self, item):
      if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
      raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
      super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





      share|improve this answer



























        1












        1








        1







        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





        share|improve this answer















        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        darkskydarksky

        1,4261224




        1,4261224



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Jet Time Laivasto | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoJet Time - The CompanyThe CompanyManagementJet Time aloittaa lauantaina Suomi-rekisterissä olevalla Boeing 737 -koneellaJettime Finland Fleet Details and HistoryJettime Fleet Details and HistoryRegional Jet OÜ takes over ATR production for SASJet Time Returns To Its Core BusinessYhtiön kotisivutlaajentamalla

            Olympian arkeologinen museo Sisällysluettelo Historia ja rakennus | Kokoelmat | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | Navigointivalikko37°38′36″N, 21°37′46″EInfobox OKArchaeological Museum of Olympia: HistoryArchaeological Museum of Olympia: DescriptionΜουσείο Ιστορίας των Ολυμπιακών Αγώνων της Αρχαιότητας: ΙστορικόArchaeological Museum of Olympia

            Äpy Sisällysluettelo Äpyt kautta historian | Esimerkkejä Äpy-huumorista | Katso myös | Kirjallisuutta | Aiheesta muualla | Navigointivalikkowww.äpy.fi