Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property NameHow to convey LWC's complex Reactive property back to markup?How to set a public reactive property in the declared component during component constructionProperty “selectedContact” of [object:vm undefined > (51)] is set to a non-trackable objectHow to set default value for a select in lwc

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?

Today is the Center

RSA: Danger of using p to create q

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Roll the carpet

Do other languages have an "irreversible aspect"?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Horror movie about a virus at the prom; beginning and end are stylized as a cartoon

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

How to format long polynomial?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

What doth I be?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

A case of the sniffles

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property Name


How to convey LWC's complex Reactive property back to markup?How to set a public reactive property in the declared component during component constructionProperty “selectedContact” of [object:vm undefined > (51)] is set to a non-trackable objectHow to set default value for a select in lwc






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question






















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    7 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago

















3















Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question






















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    7 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago













3












3








3








Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?










share|improve this question














Am not doing anything fancy, just trying to update a field on Contact in JS of LWC but getting this exception.



Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'Name'
throws at mydomain/auraFW/javascript/mhontaYdOya4Y_lBu7v9yg/aura_prod.js:2:27687



HTML Code:



<template>

<template if:true=wiredContact>

wiredContact.Name

<lightning-input value=wiredContact.Name onchange=updateName></lightning-input>
</template>

</template>


JS:



import LightningElement ,wire,track,api from 'lwc';
import myContact from "@salesforce/apex/ContactController.fetchContact";

export default class Myrefreshapextest extends LightningElement


@track wiredContact;

@wire (myContact)
fetchedContact(error, data)
if(data)
console.log(JSON.stringify(data));
this.wiredContact = data;
else if (error)
console.log(error);



updateName (event)
console.log(JSON.stringify(event.detail.value));
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact));
this.wiredContact.Name = event.detail.value;





Apex:



public class ContactController 

@AuraEnabled(cacheable=true)
public static Contact fetchContact()
return [SELECT Id,Name FROM COntact LIMIT 1];




On top of my head, am not doing anything wrong, anyone has idea what's wrong with my code?



When I print console.log(JSON.stringify(this.wiredContact)); I get old values so am pretty sure it exists.



I tried with @track and @api, but same response. Can anyone shed some light?







lightning-web-components






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 7 hours ago









Pranay JaiswalPranay Jaiswal

18.6k53158




18.6k53158












  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    7 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago

















  • Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    7 hours ago












  • I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago











  • @JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

    – sfdcfox
    7 hours ago











  • @sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

    – Jayant Das
    7 hours ago
















Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago





Do you get same issue when you use the individual field names viz., FirstName?

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago













Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago






Same error Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property 'FirstName' throws at its same error doesnt matter if its normal contact or personAccountContact.

– Pranay Jaiswal
7 hours ago














I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago





I got the error (not exactly the same) but was able to replicate. Seems like you cannot set a value directly to the property instead recreate the JSON and then assign. E.g., this.wiredContact = ["Name:" + event.detail.value]; this worked. Still trying to figure out.

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago













@JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

– sfdcfox
7 hours ago





@JayantDas It's a design feature. One that I'm pretty sure isn't documented.

– sfdcfox
7 hours ago













@sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago





@sfdcfox I just saw the behavior you mentioned just by trying it out, and it worked, even though my format above is not JSON, but I was intending that.

– Jayant Das
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    1 hour ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    24 mins ago


















1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256761%2funcaught-typeerror-set-on-proxy-trap-returned-falsish-for-property-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    1 hour ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    24 mins ago















3














Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer























  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    1 hour ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    24 mins ago













3












3








3







Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);





share|improve this answer













Cached items are set as read-only (because otherwise you could corrupt the cache). If you want a modifiable object, you need to clone it.



this.wiredContact = Object.assign(, data);






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









sfdcfoxsfdcfox

263k12209456




263k12209456












  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    1 hour ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    24 mins ago

















  • +1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago












  • Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago











  • @JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

    – tsalb
    1 hour ago












  • @tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

    – Jayant Das
    24 mins ago
















+1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago






+1 for Object.assign(). Didn't know something like this existed.

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago














Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago





Thanks sfdcfox. You are truly a Javascript wizard.

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago













@JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

– tsalb
1 hour ago






@JayantDas In ES6, the syntactic sugar is: this.wiredContact = ...data;

– tsalb
1 hour ago














@tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

– Jayant Das
24 mins ago





@tsalb Thanks for sharing. I now recollect coming it across on one of Pranay’s another question

– Jayant Das
24 mins ago













1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago















1














This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer























  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago













1












1








1







This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";





share|improve this answer













This is what I could find from the documentation for wired service and that seems to be the case here (emphasis mine).




The wire service provisions an immutable stream of data to the component




So it most likely seems that when trying to set the values directly using this.wiredContact.Name, because of it's read only property, the values are not getting set.



However if you try to create a new data and then assign it to this.wiredContact, it works:



this.wiredContact = "Name:" + event.detail.value + "";






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









Jayant DasJayant Das

18k21330




18k21330












  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago

















  • This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

    – sfdcfox
    6 hours ago











  • Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago











  • +1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

    – Pranay Jaiswal
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

    – Jayant Das
    6 hours ago
















This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

– sfdcfox
6 hours ago





This solution presumes only one field. If you have multiple fields, you must remember to encode all of them or lose data. The solution I presented avoids this problem by copying everything on initialization, leaving the variable free to be modified in all other function calls.

– sfdcfox
6 hours ago













Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago





Yeah, this was a more direct answer to the problem that Pranay had mentioned. I am not really good at JS, so didn't even know how to do so unless you mentioned.

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago













+1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago





+1 thanks for linking documentation. This was freaking me out.

– Pranay Jaiswal
6 hours ago




1




1





I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago





I started looking only when @sfdcfox mentioned it was possibly not :) But at least it is mentioned. Easy to miss!

– Jayant Das
6 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256761%2funcaught-typeerror-set-on-proxy-trap-returned-falsish-for-property-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Disable / Remove link to Product Items in Cart Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How can I limit products that can be bought / added to cart?Remove item from cartHide “Add to Cart” button if specific products are already in cart“Prettifying” the custom options in cart pageCreate link in cart sidebar to view all added items After limit reachedLink products together in checkout/cartHow to Get product from cart and add it againHide action-edit on cart page if simple productRemoving Cart items - ObserverRemove wishlist items when added to cart

Helsingin valtaus Sisällysluettelo Taustaa | Yleistä sotatoimista | Osapuolet | Taistelut Helsingin ympäristössä | Punaisten antautumissuunnitelma | Taistelujen kulku Helsingissä | Valtauksen jälkeen | Tappiot | Muistaminen | Kirjallisuutta | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoTeoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioGoogle BooksSisällissota Helsingissä päättyi tasan 95 vuotta sittenSaksalaisten ylivoima jyräsi punaisen HelsinginSuomalaiset kuvaavat sotien jälkiä kaupungeissa – katso kuvat ja tarinat tutuilta kulmiltaHelsingin valtaus 90 vuotta sittenSaksalaiset valtasivat HelsinginHyökkäys HelsinkiinHelsingin valtaus 12.–13.4. 1918Saksalaiset käyttivät ihmiskilpiä Helsingin valtauksessa 1918Teoksen verkkoversioTeoksen verkkoversioSaksalaiset hyökkäävät Etelä-SuomeenTaistelut LeppävaarassaSotilaat ja taistelutLeppävaara 1918 huhtikuussa. KapinatarinaHelsingin taistelut 1918Saksalaisten voitonparaati HelsingissäHelsingin valtausta juhlittiinSaksalaisten Helsinki vuonna 1918Helsingin taistelussa kaatuneet valkokaartilaisetHelsinkiin haudatut taisteluissa kaatuneet punaiset12.4.1918 Helsingin valtauksessa saksalaiset apujoukot vapauttavat kaupunginVapaussodan muistomerkkejä Helsingissä ja pääkaupunkiseudullaCrescendo / Vuoden 1918 Kansalaissodan uhrien muistomerkkim

Adjektiivitarina Tarinan tekeminen | Esimerkki: ennen | Esimerkki: jälkeen | Navigointivalikko