What was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWere there 8086 coprocessors other than the 8087?What was the first CPU with exposed pipeline?What's the relationship between early 90s Pentium microprocessor and today's Intel designs?Is there any reason to chose ES, FS, or GS over the others in real mode?How do you put a 286 in Protected Mode?Why not use fractions instead of floating point?Which pre-IEEE computers had a single precision FPU and implemented double precision floats in software?How did the 8086 interface with the 8087 FPU coprocessor?How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?What can an 8086 CPU do if an x87 floating-point coprocessor is attached to it?
"as much details as you can remember"
What does もの mean in this sentence?
Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)
Why does the nucleus not repel itself?
How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
The phrase "to the numbers born"?
Is bread bad for ducks?
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?
Output the Arecibo Message
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
How do PCB vias affect signal quality?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
What was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWere there 8086 coprocessors other than the 8087?What was the first CPU with exposed pipeline?What's the relationship between early 90s Pentium microprocessor and today's Intel designs?Is there any reason to chose ES, FS, or GS over the others in real mode?How do you put a 286 in Protected Mode?Why not use fractions instead of floating point?Which pre-IEEE computers had a single precision FPU and implemented double precision floats in software?How did the 8086 interface with the 8087 FPU coprocessor?How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?What can an 8086 CPU do if an x87 floating-point coprocessor is attached to it?
This Wikipedia page says the following:
Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU
So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.
But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
history intel floating-point cpu x86
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
This Wikipedia page says the following:
Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU
So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.
But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
history intel floating-point cpu x86
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
This Wikipedia page says the following:
Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU
So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.
But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
history intel floating-point cpu x86
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This Wikipedia page says the following:
Most x86 processors since the Intel 80486 have had these x87
instructions implemented in the main CPU
So the above quote means that some CPUs that were realeased after the Intel 80486 CPU did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in.
But what was the last CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
history intel floating-point cpu x86
history intel floating-point cpu x86
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
edited 1 hour ago
manassehkatz
3,132625
3,132625
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
asked 2 hours ago
user12280user12280
232
232
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user12280 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).
Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.
In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.
I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.
* for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
add a comment |
As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).
Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.
In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.
I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.
* for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
add a comment |
All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).
Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.
In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.
I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.
* for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
add a comment |
All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).
Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.
In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.
I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.
* for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
All Intel x86 CPUs since the 80486 line have included floating point instructions, i.e. everything from the Pentium* onwards. So the last Intel processor to lack an on-board floating-point unit (FPU) was the 80486SX (and the embedded 80486GX).
Other manufacturers, who made 486-compatible processors, continued making non-FPU chips, aiming for the budget market. These include Cyrix's Cx486SLC, and AMD's AM486SX. A 66MHz version of the latter, the Am486SX2-66, was released in 1994, a year after Intel had released its first Pentium processor.
In order to compete with the Pentium range, third-party manufacturers effectively had to include an on-board FPU, so there were no "586" chips without floating-point instructions.
I expect that the last manufactured x86 CPU that lacked floating-point instructions will have been an embedded chip such as the 80486GX.
* for further reading, see the Pentium FDIV bug
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
answered 1 hour ago
KazKaz
2,456942
2,456942
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
add a comment |
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
Yes, there are 586-class CPUs with no FPU.
– Stephen Kitt
43 mins ago
add a comment |
As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
add a comment |
As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
add a comment |
As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
As far as I’m aware, the last FPU-less x86-compatible CPU is the Vortex86SX, released in 2007 and still available now. This is a Pentium-class CPU, capable of running any Pentium code which doesn’t require an FPU.
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
edited 57 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
answered 1 hour ago
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
40k8163173
40k8163173
add a comment |
add a comment |
user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user12280 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9660%2fwhat-was-the-last-cpu-that-did-not-have-the-x87-floating-point-unit-built-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
