Hjdcti

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Emailing HOD to enhance faculty application

Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end

In Romance of the Three Kingdoms why do people still use bamboo sticks when papers are already invented?

Is it canonical bit space?

Famous Pre Reformation Christian Pastors (Non Catholic and Non Orthodox)

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces

Why can't we play rap on piano?

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

Why is the 'in' operator throwing an error with a string literal instead of logging false?

Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?

Can I make "comment-region" comment empty lines?

Reserved de-dupe rules

Today is the Center

Brothers & sisters

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

UK: Is there precedent for the governments e-petition site changing the direction of a government decision?

What is going on with Captain Marvel's blood colour?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

What killed these X2 caps?

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

Symbol for contraction / interior product?mathabx package and Maya symbols problemAutomatic spacing of symbolsIs This Laplace Transform Symbol Available in LaTeX?Matplotlib symbolsmaking new symbol from two symbolsHow can I produce the symbols representing sign conventions for forces and moments in mechanical equilibrium equations?Spacing of symbols defined in tikzChemical symbols for the order of a rotational axisHow to find these symbols in LaTeX?

6

0

There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

6

0

There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

edited 9 hours ago

JouleV

10.5k22559

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

New contributor

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 10 hours ago

Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

311

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

12

Just combine existing symbols:

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

begindocument

$blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
$>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
$blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

enddocument

joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.

As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.

$>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$

My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?
  
  – AJFarmar
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

10

This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.

Like campa's result, it works across math styles.

The MWE:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
newcommandbicrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbicrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
begindocument
$xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$, 

$xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$, 
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.
  
  – Steven B. Segletes
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  None taken :-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Oliver Morrison is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483160%2fhow-do-i-write-bicross-product-symbols-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

12

Just combine existing symbols:

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

begindocument

$blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
$>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
$blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

enddocument

joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.

As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.

$>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$

My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?
  
  – AJFarmar
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

12

Just combine existing symbols:

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

begindocument

$blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
$>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
$blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

enddocument

joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.

As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.

$>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$

My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?
  
  – AJFarmar
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Just combine existing symbols:

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

begindocument

$blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
$>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
$blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

enddocument

joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.

As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.

$>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$

My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

begindocument

$blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
$>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
$blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

enddocument

$>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
$mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

answered 9 hours ago

campacampa

6,66521439

10

This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.

Like campa's result, it works across math styles.

The MWE:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
newcommandbicrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbicrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
begindocument
$xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$, 

$xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$, 
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.
  
  – Steven B. Segletes
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  None taken :-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

10

This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.

Like campa's result, it works across math styles.

The MWE:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
newcommandbicrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbicrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
begindocument
$xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$, 

$xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$, 
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.
  
  – Steven B. Segletes
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  None taken :-)
  
  – campa
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.

Like campa's result, it works across math styles.

The MWE:

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
newcommandbicrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbicrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
begindocument
$xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$, 

$xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$, 
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
newcommandbicrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbicrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossl%
 mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
newcommandbiopencrossr%
 mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
begindocument
$xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$, 

$xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$, 

$scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$, 
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 6 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415

answered 9 hours ago

Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

161k9205415