“ne paelici suspectaretur” (Tacitus)Quality of final ĕ ĭ ŏ
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Can fracking help reduce CO2?
Is it possible to Ready a spell to be cast just before the start of your next turn by having the trigger be an ally's attack?
In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work
A question regarding using the definite article
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Can I get candy for a Pokemon I haven't caught yet?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Does jamais mean always or never in this context?
Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian
What word means to make something obsolete?
Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?
How to back up a running remote server?
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
Multiple options for Pseudonyms
How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
Toggle Overlays shortcut?
What does YCWCYODFTRFDTY mean?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Cannot populate data in lightning data table
Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw?
When did stoichiometry begin to be taught in U.S. high schools?
Past Perfect Tense
“ne paelici suspectaretur” (Tacitus)
Quality of final ĕ ĭ ŏ
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
add a comment |
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
add a comment |
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
Tacitus, Annales 4.3:
pellit domo Seianus uxorem Apicatam, ex qua tres liberos genuerat, ne paelici suspectaretur.
The translation on Perseus (Church and Brodribb) gives:
Sejanus, to avert his mistress's jealousy, divorced his wife Apicata, by whom he had had three children.
How does ne paelici suspectaretur mean to avert his mistress's jealousy?
Ne suspectaretur is easy: "lest he should be suspected". Paelici is a dative of paelex "mistress". But I'm not seeing what a dative could be doing in this clause.
Apparently, too, there's an alternate reading of this phrase: L&S under suspecto quote this as ne pellici suspectaretur, with a passive infinitive of pellicio "allure, entice". It would then mean "lest he be suspected of being enticed". This at least works grammatically, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean.
What's going on with this phrase?
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
classical-latin meaning dativus tacitus
edited 7 mins ago
Cerberus♦
12.1k23476
12.1k23476
asked 5 hours ago
TKRTKR
14.6k3259
14.6k3259
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10584%2fne-paelici-suspectaretur-tacitus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
add a comment |
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
add a comment |
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
This can be read as a dativus auctoris. It should then be translated thus:
lest he should be suspected by his mistress / be suspect to his mistress
Common in gerundive constructions (hostis nobis vincendus est), the dativus auctoris is also occasionally used with other passive verbs; it is then most common with past participles (mihi cognitum est: "it is known by me" or "it is known to me"). It indicates the person by whom something is done. Especially with verbs expressing a judgement, it is somewhat similar to the ordinary dative of videtur mihi "it seems to me" etc. Lewis & Short say the verb in this particular quotation is passive, i.e. not the deponent verb suspector.
According to Kühner–Stegmann¹, this dativus auctoris was only used in the perfect and with a personal pronoun in older Latin (pace their own Accius example, see below); but Cicero and various later authors used it with other passive forms and substantive nouns, too. K.–S. also mention Tacitus specifically.
In poetry, it is (especially) used by the Augustan poets, even non metri causa. They say the construction is originally Latin, but was extended under Greek influence (after all, the agent in a passive construction is normally expressed by a dative in Greek).
Here follow a few examples taken from K.–S. and Gildersleeve:
Accius, Tragoediae 284:
DIOMEDES:
Ergo me Argos referam, nam hic sum gnobilis
ne cui cognoscar noto.
"Then I will go back to Argos, for here I am notable, lest I be recognised by someone I know."
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes 5.68.4:
"Sumatur...nobis quidam praestans vir..."
"Let us assume an excellent man..."
Tacitus, Annales 2.50.13:
... ut exemplo maiorum propinquis suis ultra ducentesimum lapidem removeretur suasit.
" ...he suggested that, according to ancient custom, she should be removed by her next of kin beyond the two-hundredth milestone."
Tacitus, Annales 12.1.1:
Aelia Paetina...Narcisso fovebatur.
"Aelia Paetina was favoured by Narcissus."
The past participle or adjective suspectus is often used with a dative, which may also have influenced Tacitus to use the dativus auctoris with a passive imperfect (as in the quotation in question). Two examples with suspectus:
Sallustius, Bellum Iugurthinum 70.1.1:
Bomilcar...suspectus regi et ipse eum suspiciens novas res cupere...
"Bomilcar, suspected by the King [or: suspect to the King], and himself suspecting the King, desired a change of power..."
Tacitus, Annales 14.44.10:
Suspecta maioribus nostris fuerunt ingenia servorum...
"To our ancestors, the temper of their slaves was suspect..."
¹) Satzlehre vol. I (1912), §76 8d, p. 324:
edited 2 mins ago
answered 30 mins ago
Cerberus♦Cerberus
12.1k23476
12.1k23476
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f10584%2fne-paelici-suspectaretur-tacitus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown