Hjdcti

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

What do you call the main part of a joke?

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

What font is "z" in "z-score"?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

Do square wave exist?

If a VARCHAR(MAX) column is included in an index, is the entire value always stored in the index page(s)?

Did MS DOS itself ever use blinking text?

8 Prisoners wearing hats

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

2001: A Space Odyssey's use of the song "Daisy Bell" (Bicycle Built for Two); life imitates art or vice-versa?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Would "destroying" Wurmcoil Engine prevent its tokens from being created?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

If u is orthogonal to both v and w, and u not equal to 0, argue that u is not in the span of v and w. (

1

$begingroup$

QN: If u is orthogonal to both v and w, and u ≠ 0, argue that u is not in the span of v and w.

Where I am at:

I get stuck when it comes to solving my augmented matrix with Gauss Jordan Elimination.

I also tried formulating the following steps to solve the problem.

1. Create instances of u, v and w that pertain to the question. My visualisation in Geogebra can be viewed here: https://ggbm.at/b6xvwhpa




2. Set u = av + bw = u (where a and b are constants)



3. Disprove (2)

However, I could not get past step 1.

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

linear-algebra matrices

share|cite|improve this question

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

QN: If u is orthogonal to both v and w, and u ≠ 0, argue that u is not in the span of v and w.

Where I am at:

I get stuck when it comes to solving my augmented matrix with Gauss Jordan Elimination.

I also tried formulating the following steps to solve the problem.

1. Create instances of u, v and w that pertain to the question. My visualisation in Geogebra can be viewed here: https://ggbm.at/b6xvwhpa




2. Set u = av + bw = u (where a and b are constants)



3. Disprove (2)

However, I could not get past step 1.

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

linear-algebra matrices

share|cite|improve this question

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

QN: If u is orthogonal to both v and w, and u ≠ 0, argue that u is not in the span of v and w.

Where I am at:

I get stuck when it comes to solving my augmented matrix with Gauss Jordan Elimination.

I also tried formulating the following steps to solve the problem.

1. Create instances of u, v and w that pertain to the question. My visualisation in Geogebra can be viewed here: https://ggbm.at/b6xvwhpa




2. Set u = av + bw = u (where a and b are constants)



3. Disprove (2)

However, I could not get past step 1.

Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

linear-algebra matrices

share|cite|improve this question

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

edited 16 mins ago

YuiTo Cheng

2,52341037

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

New contributor

Dimen3ional is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 28 mins ago

Dimen3ionalDimen3ional

82

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

$begingroup$

$defmyvec#1bf#1$
This is the same as saying

if $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, and $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=myvec 0$.

So, if $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=amyvec v+bmyvec w$ for some scalars $a,b$. Assuming also $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, this means $myvec ucdot myvec v=0$ and $myvec ucdotmyvec w=0$, so
$$myvec ucdot myvec u=myvec ucdot(amyvec v+bmyvec w)=a(myvec ucdot myvec v)+b(myvec ucdot myvec w)=a0+b0=0 .$$
Since $myvec ucdot myvec u=0$ we have $myvec u=myvec 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I thought about this, however, the question specifically states that u can not be zero. If u can't be zero does that not prevent the above proof, or am I looking at this the wrong way?
  $endgroup$
  – Dimen3ional
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Have you studied proof by contradiction or by contrapositive? That's what this is.
  $endgroup$
  – David
  12 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

If $u$ belongs to the span of $v$ and $w$ the $u=av+bw$ for some scalars $a$ and $b$. Since $langle u, v rangle=0$ and $langle u, w rangle=0$ we get $langle u, (av+bw) rangle=0$ so $langle u, u rangle=0$. This means $u=0$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Dimen3ional is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192025%2fif-u-is-orthogonal-to-both-v-and-w-and-u-not-equal-to-0-argue-that-u-is-not-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

$begingroup$

$defmyvec#1bf#1$
This is the same as saying

if $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, and $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=myvec 0$.

So, if $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=amyvec v+bmyvec w$ for some scalars $a,b$. Assuming also $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, this means $myvec ucdot myvec v=0$ and $myvec ucdotmyvec w=0$, so
$$myvec ucdot myvec u=myvec ucdot(amyvec v+bmyvec w)=a(myvec ucdot myvec v)+b(myvec ucdot myvec w)=a0+b0=0 .$$
Since $myvec ucdot myvec u=0$ we have $myvec u=myvec 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I thought about this, however, the question specifically states that u can not be zero. If u can't be zero does that not prevent the above proof, or am I looking at this the wrong way?
  $endgroup$
  – Dimen3ional
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Have you studied proof by contradiction or by contrapositive? That's what this is.
  $endgroup$
  – David
  12 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

$defmyvec#1bf#1$
This is the same as saying

if $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, and $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=myvec 0$.

So, if $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=amyvec v+bmyvec w$ for some scalars $a,b$. Assuming also $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, this means $myvec ucdot myvec v=0$ and $myvec ucdotmyvec w=0$, so
$$myvec ucdot myvec u=myvec ucdot(amyvec v+bmyvec w)=a(myvec ucdot myvec v)+b(myvec ucdot myvec w)=a0+b0=0 .$$
Since $myvec ucdot myvec u=0$ we have $myvec u=myvec 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I thought about this, however, the question specifically states that u can not be zero. If u can't be zero does that not prevent the above proof, or am I looking at this the wrong way?
  $endgroup$
  – Dimen3ional
  13 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Have you studied proof by contradiction or by contrapositive? That's what this is.
  $endgroup$
  – David
  12 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

$defmyvec#1bf#1$
This is the same as saying

if $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, and $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=myvec 0$.

So, if $myvec u$ is in the span of $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, then $myvec u=amyvec v+bmyvec w$ for some scalars $a,b$. Assuming also $myvec u$ is orthogonal to both $myvec v$ and $myvec w$, this means $myvec ucdot myvec v=0$ and $myvec ucdotmyvec w=0$, so
$$myvec ucdot myvec u=myvec ucdot(amyvec v+bmyvec w)=a(myvec ucdot myvec v)+b(myvec ucdot myvec w)=a0+b0=0 .$$
Since $myvec ucdot myvec u=0$ we have $myvec u=myvec 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

answered 20 mins ago

DavidDavid

70.1k668131

2

$begingroup$

If $u$ belongs to the span of $v$ and $w$ the $u=av+bw$ for some scalars $a$ and $b$. Since $langle u, v rangle=0$ and $langle u, w rangle=0$ we get $langle u, (av+bw) rangle=0$ so $langle u, u rangle=0$. This means $u=0$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

If $u$ belongs to the span of $v$ and $w$ the $u=av+bw$ for some scalars $a$ and $b$. Since $langle u, v rangle=0$ and $langle u, w rangle=0$ we get $langle u, (av+bw) rangle=0$ so $langle u, u rangle=0$. This means $u=0$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

If $u$ belongs to the span of $v$ and $w$ the $u=av+bw$ for some scalars $a$ and $b$. Since $langle u, v rangle=0$ and $langle u, w rangle=0$ we get $langle u, (av+bw) rangle=0$ so $langle u, u rangle=0$. This means $u=0$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270

answered 19 mins ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

75.6k53270