Hjdcti

Copycat chess is back

Concept of linear mappings are confusing me

The magic money tree problem

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).

cryptic clue: mammal sounds like relative consumer (8)

Is there a minimum number of transactions in a block?

Copenhagen passport control - US citizen

New order #4: World

Can you lasso down a wizard who is using the Levitate spell?

Example of a relative pronoun

Motorized valve interfering with button?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

Patience, young "Padovan"

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?

I see my dog run

Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?

What makes Graph invariants so useful/important?

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

How Can I Run an Shell Script With .desktop Config File?Automated Shell script to run fdisk command with user inputcustomized shell script can not be runUnable to Run Shell Script on UbuntuUbuntu Unity 16.10 'sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified'Can I run shell script together with application?Executable shell script doesn't runShell script for network manager not completingcurl command not executing via shell script in bashHow can I run gsettings from a GNOME Shell Extension?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

4

1

I have a small sh script that I use to backup to a remote server. It worked on Ubuntu 16.04 for years, but now on 18.04 it fails. At first I thought it was a problem with anacron, but now I think it is a problem with the script itself or with dash. Here is what is happening:

stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sudo chmod +x rsync-doc-script 
[sudo] Mot de passe de stefan : 
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ ./rsync-doc-script 
/bin/sh: 0: Can't open *
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sh rsync-doc-script
opening connection using: ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa -l totem MouseHouse rsync --server -vvlogDtprze.iLsfxC . /totembackup/totemdoc (11 args)
ssh: connect to host mousehouse port 22: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(235) [sender=3.1.2]
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ 

The error can't open * is preventing the script from running correctly when run by run-parts. Why is this error occurring?

It is not relevant that in the last line, when the script ran, it couldn't establish connection. The server is turned off now.

Here is the script:

#!/bin/sh *
rsync -azvv -e "ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa" /home/stefan/Documents/ totem@MouseHouse:/totembackup/totemdoc

bash scripts sh

share|improve this question

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

add a comment | 

4

1

I have a small sh script that I use to backup to a remote server. It worked on Ubuntu 16.04 for years, but now on 18.04 it fails. At first I thought it was a problem with anacron, but now I think it is a problem with the script itself or with dash. Here is what is happening:

stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sudo chmod +x rsync-doc-script 
[sudo] Mot de passe de stefan : 
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ ./rsync-doc-script 
/bin/sh: 0: Can't open *
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sh rsync-doc-script
opening connection using: ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa -l totem MouseHouse rsync --server -vvlogDtprze.iLsfxC . /totembackup/totemdoc (11 args)
ssh: connect to host mousehouse port 22: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(235) [sender=3.1.2]
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ 

The error can't open * is preventing the script from running correctly when run by run-parts. Why is this error occurring?

It is not relevant that in the last line, when the script ran, it couldn't establish connection. The server is turned off now.

Here is the script:

#!/bin/sh *
rsync -azvv -e "ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa" /home/stefan/Documents/ totem@MouseHouse:/totembackup/totemdoc

bash scripts sh

share|improve this question

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

add a comment | 

I have a small sh script that I use to backup to a remote server. It worked on Ubuntu 16.04 for years, but now on 18.04 it fails. At first I thought it was a problem with anacron, but now I think it is a problem with the script itself or with dash. Here is what is happening:

stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sudo chmod +x rsync-doc-script 
[sudo] Mot de passe de stefan : 
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ ./rsync-doc-script 
/bin/sh: 0: Can't open *
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sh rsync-doc-script
opening connection using: ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa -l totem MouseHouse rsync --server -vvlogDtprze.iLsfxC . /totembackup/totemdoc (11 args)
ssh: connect to host mousehouse port 22: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(235) [sender=3.1.2]
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ 

The error can't open * is preventing the script from running correctly when run by run-parts. Why is this error occurring?

It is not relevant that in the last line, when the script ran, it couldn't establish connection. The server is turned off now.

Here is the script:

#!/bin/sh *
rsync -azvv -e "ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa" /home/stefan/Documents/ totem@MouseHouse:/totembackup/totemdoc

bash scripts sh

share|improve this question

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sudo chmod +x rsync-doc-script 
[sudo] Mot de passe de stefan : 
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ ./rsync-doc-script 
/bin/sh: 0: Can't open *
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ sh rsync-doc-script
opening connection using: ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa -l totem MouseHouse rsync --server -vvlogDtprze.iLsfxC . /totembackup/totemdoc (11 args)
ssh: connect to host mousehouse port 22: Connection refused
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(235) [sender=3.1.2]
stefan@stefan-Aspire-F5-573T:/etc/cron.daily$ 

#!/bin/sh *
rsync -azvv -e "ssh -i /home/stefan/.ssh/id_rsa" /home/stefan/Documents/ totem@MouseHouse:/totembackup/totemdoc

share|improve this question

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

share|improve this question

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

asked 9 hours ago

Stefan DawydiakStefan Dawydiak

1385

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

7

I'd switch from using #!/bin/sh as your shebang to #!/bin/bash since you're expecting Bash features vs. /bin/sh or /bin/dash.

Also I can't tell for sure but it looks like you have a typo on the first line where there's a stray * over to the right.

#!/bin/sh *

^^^ Scroll over to the right to see it.

Example

$ cat script.bash
#!/bin/sh *
echo hi

Run directly:

$ ./script.bash
/bin/sh: *: No such file or directory

Run via sh:

$ sh script.bash
hi

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Exactly, this asterisk is producing a syntax error when the shebang line is used, thus preventing the script from being run. OP’s script is not using any bash features though, there’s no need to make it #!/bin/bash. A shebang line #!/bin/bash * throws an error as well.
  
  – dessert
  9 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dessert - I state that as a general practice, if you expect features from X, use X.
  
  – slm
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @slm That doesn't make sense... You state in your answer "... since you're expecting Bash features ...", but the OP is clearly not using any bash features in his script. I agree with dessert that the #!/bin/bash advice is misplaced. It's the "also" part of your answer that is the actual answer ;)
  
  – marcelm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @marcelm - as I stated to dessert above, if someone is attempting to use the features of something, better to use it directly vs. indirectly. I'm not saying that the OP was actually using any Bash features per say, just that they're writing a Bash script so call it out directly vs. sh.
  
  – slm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So what does that trailing asterisk (*) do in bash?
  
  – user000001
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1131967%2fshell-script-can-be-run-only-with-sh-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

7

I'd switch from using #!/bin/sh as your shebang to #!/bin/bash since you're expecting Bash features vs. /bin/sh or /bin/dash.

Also I can't tell for sure but it looks like you have a typo on the first line where there's a stray * over to the right.

#!/bin/sh *

^^^ Scroll over to the right to see it.

Example

$ cat script.bash
#!/bin/sh *
echo hi

Run directly:

$ ./script.bash
/bin/sh: *: No such file or directory

Run via sh:

$ sh script.bash
hi

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Exactly, this asterisk is producing a syntax error when the shebang line is used, thus preventing the script from being run. OP’s script is not using any bash features though, there’s no need to make it #!/bin/bash. A shebang line #!/bin/bash * throws an error as well.
  
  – dessert
  9 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dessert - I state that as a general practice, if you expect features from X, use X.
  
  – slm
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @slm That doesn't make sense... You state in your answer "... since you're expecting Bash features ...", but the OP is clearly not using any bash features in his script. I agree with dessert that the #!/bin/bash advice is misplaced. It's the "also" part of your answer that is the actual answer ;)
  
  – marcelm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @marcelm - as I stated to dessert above, if someone is attempting to use the features of something, better to use it directly vs. indirectly. I'm not saying that the OP was actually using any Bash features per say, just that they're writing a Bash script so call it out directly vs. sh.
  
  – slm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So what does that trailing asterisk (*) do in bash?
  
  – user000001
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

7

I'd switch from using #!/bin/sh as your shebang to #!/bin/bash since you're expecting Bash features vs. /bin/sh or /bin/dash.

Also I can't tell for sure but it looks like you have a typo on the first line where there's a stray * over to the right.

#!/bin/sh *

^^^ Scroll over to the right to see it.

Example

$ cat script.bash
#!/bin/sh *
echo hi

Run directly:

$ ./script.bash
/bin/sh: *: No such file or directory

Run via sh:

$ sh script.bash
hi

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

• 
  
  
  

  
  6
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Exactly, this asterisk is producing a syntax error when the shebang line is used, thus preventing the script from being run. OP’s script is not using any bash features though, there’s no need to make it #!/bin/bash. A shebang line #!/bin/bash * throws an error as well.
  
  – dessert
  9 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @dessert - I state that as a general practice, if you expect features from X, use X.
  
  – slm
  9 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @slm That doesn't make sense... You state in your answer "... since you're expecting Bash features ...", but the OP is clearly not using any bash features in his script. I agree with dessert that the #!/bin/bash advice is misplaced. It's the "also" part of your answer that is the actual answer ;)
  
  – marcelm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @marcelm - as I stated to dessert above, if someone is attempting to use the features of something, better to use it directly vs. indirectly. I'm not saying that the OP was actually using any Bash features per say, just that they're writing a Bash script so call it out directly vs. sh.
  
  – slm
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So what does that trailing asterisk (*) do in bash?
  
  – user000001
  7 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

I'd switch from using #!/bin/sh as your shebang to #!/bin/bash since you're expecting Bash features vs. /bin/sh or /bin/dash.

Also I can't tell for sure but it looks like you have a typo on the first line where there's a stray * over to the right.

#!/bin/sh *

^^^ Scroll over to the right to see it.

Example

$ cat script.bash
#!/bin/sh *
echo hi

Run directly:

$ ./script.bash
/bin/sh: *: No such file or directory

Run via sh:

$ sh script.bash
hi

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

#!/bin/sh *

$ cat script.bash
#!/bin/sh *
echo hi

$ ./script.bash
/bin/sh: *: No such file or directory

$ sh script.bash
hi

share|improve this answer

edited 9 hours ago

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826

answered 9 hours ago

slmslm

1,89911826